This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][SH] fix atomic function names

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:47:25 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH][SH] fix atomic function names
References: <4.2.0.58.J.20090803142356.042da950@router.itonet.co.jp> <20090803.180852.194326173.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20090807000324.041f0be8@router.itonet.co.jp>

SUGIOKA Toshinobu <sugioka@itonet.co.jp> wrote:
> 	* config/sh/linux-atomic.asm (ATOMIC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP): Rename
> 	__sync_compare_and_swap_* to __sync_val_compare_and_swap_*.
> 	(ATOMIC_OP_AND_FETCH, ATOMIC_COMBOP_AND_FETCH): Define.
> 	(__sync_*_and_fetch_*,  __sync_synchronize, __sync_lock_release_*):
> 	New function.

I've applied your patch as revision 150371 and have also
added __sync_*_and_fetch_* at revision 150469.  Please
check current trunk.

As rth has said already, __sync_synchronize and
__sync_lock_release_* intrinsics are expanded directly
without library function calls on this target.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- [PATCH][SH] fix atomic function names
  - From: SUGIOKA Toshinobu
- Re: [PATCH][SH] fix atomic function names
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: [PATCH][SH] fix atomic function names
  - From: SUGIOKA Toshinobu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]