This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH PR target/40834: [4.5 Regression] standard_sse_constant_opcode crash on x86 64

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ubizjak at gmail dot com
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:14:03 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH PR target/40834: [4.5 Regression] standard_sse_constant_opcode crash on x86 64
References: <20090805180158.GA6457@lucon.org>

On 08/05/2009 11:01 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:

-	return TARGET_AVX ? 3 : -3;
+	return -3;


Why aren't we returning 0 here?
I think these negative numbers are a mistake.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH PR target/40834: [4.5 Regression] standard_sse_constant_opcode crash on x86 64
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH PR target/40834: [4.5 Regression] standard_sse_constant_opcode crash on x86 64
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]