This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:35:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907061525300.16347@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4A5F39F4.6010104@redhat.com>

> Running target unix/
> FAIL: StackTrace2 output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test

If I remember right, we had problems with this testcase in the pass too,
since it relies on middle end not inlining function but the functions is not
marked such?

Honza
> 
> 		=== libjava Summary for unix/ ===
> 
> # of expected passes		2570
> # of unexpected failures	4
> 
> Running target unix//-m32
> FAIL: StackTrace2 output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 output - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test
> 
> 		=== libjava Summary for unix//-m32 ===
> 
> The patch is not OK until this is fixed.
> 
> Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]