This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING [testsuite]: Tidy up testsuite handling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:49:45 -0700
- Subject: Re: PING [testsuite]: Tidy up testsuite handling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- References: <877hyy130x.fsf@talisman.home> <1246384607.5970.8.camel@janis-laptop> <87zlbp1sa6.fsf@talisman.home> <6dc9ffc80906301520u78a16cafpeb1fcd737a1f9f9@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Richard
> Sandiford<rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> writes:
>>> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 09:42 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>> Ping for this patch:
>>>>
>>>> ? ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00151.html
>>>>
>>>> (which should probably have had [testsuite] in the header, sorry).
>>>
>>> Good grief, it already had "testsuite" in the header twice! ?I don't
>>> know how I missed it.
>>>
>>> This is an area with which I'm not comfortable, but the patch looks
>>> much better thought-out than what was there before, so OK.
>>
>> Thanks, applied. ?I agree this is a bit of a tender area, so please
>> shout if I've broken something.
>>
>
> It may have caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40601
>
It also caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40707
--
H.J.