This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: "Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>, <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:45:21 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0906270909250.2271@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <4A463C06.4070300@net-b.de> <5FB644CBAB754D119AD498AC02560906@glap> <20090709004452.GA52973@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <94E4C840AEDF4640969C0F0EFC07D316@glap> <20090709015057.GA53270@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

From: "Steve Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

I wasn't aware (or I plain forgot) that the fallback functions
are in c99_functions.c.  AFAICT, gfortran does not make use
of these functions.


Right, but I think between the existing fallback functions, the now
available MPC code and the glue in PR33197 trigcomplex.diff attachment, one
should be able to implement ctan, csinh, ccosh and ctanh in gfortran.

--Kaveh

PS: "Not it"! :-)

References:
- Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]