This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [IFUNC] PATCH: Add an ifunc attribute
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:37 PM, H.J. Lu<email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Richard
> Guenther<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:10 PM, H.J. Lu<email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Here is a patch to add ifunc attribute, including many testscases
>>> in C and C++. ?Any comments?
>> +/* Get the function return type inside function body. ?Return a pointer
>> + ? to the function for IFUNC function. ?*/
>> +static inline tree
>> +function_return_type (const_tree decl)
>> + ?if (DECL_IS_IFUNC (decl))
>> + ? ?return build_pointer_type (TREE_TYPE (decl));
>> + ?else
>> + ? ?return TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (decl));
>> that's just ... gross. ?Instead adjust the function signature properly.
>> Which of course makes your proposal not viable at all.
>> I think your solution is overdesigned. ?Do you really expect so much
>> usage that you need to make it easy to use from C++ (easy as in
>> not mangle manually)?
> I was told that people do want to use ifunc attribute in C++ class.
They will be able to. Just not in a way that is 100% pretty and feels