This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Pretty print decl assembler names

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:15:24 -0700
Subject: Re: Pretty print decl assembler names
References: <4A398BB0.6000302@redhat.com> <6dc9ffc80906180629n431cde1fq2340a8eaa8f9fec1@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000906180634h3bbe826cne5b1766c3a3d5d2@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther wrote:

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Richard Henderson<rth@redhat.com> wrote:
I've found the following very helpful in debugging the trans-mem branch.
 Prints the assembler name (when available) of a decl, if it differs too
much from the lexical name, i.e. the name got mangled.
Merged into mainline.

r~
       * tree-pretty-print.c (maybe_dump_asm_name): New.
       (dump_decl_name): Use it.
       (PRINT_FUNCTION_NAME): Merge into...
       (dump_function_name): ... here.  Use maybe_dump_asm_name.
I think it caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40488
Yep. One reason I repeatedly chickened out applying similar patches ;)

Bother. I'm moving the feature to a new "-asmname" qualifier for the dump. And actualy running the testsuite this time -- who knew... =P

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pretty print decl assembler names
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Pretty print decl assembler names
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Pretty print decl assembler names
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Pretty print decl assembler names
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]