This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Two possible fixes for g++.dg/torture/pr32950.C failure
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Steve Ellcey<sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:31 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> You can refer to TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (from)) instead, that
>> should work here.
>>
>> Richard.
>
> Yes, that works. ?I have done a bootstrap and test with no regressions
> using this patch and it fixes pr32950.C, is it OK to check it in?
This is ok if the fix for PR40446 didn't already fix this as a side-effect.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
>
>
> 2009-06-16 ?Steve Ellcey ?<sje@cup.hp.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* expr.c (expand_assignment): Change complex type check.
>
>
>
> Index: expr.c
> ===================================================================
> --- expr.c ? ? ?(revision 148510)
> +++ expr.c ? ? ?(working copy)
> @@ -4250,7 +4250,7 @@ expand_assignment (tree to, tree from, b
> ? ? ? /* Handle expand_expr of a complex value returning a CONCAT. ?*/
> ? ? ? if (GET_CODE (to_rtx) == CONCAT)
> ? ? ? ?{
> - ? ? ? ? if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (from)) == COMPLEX_TYPE)
> + ? ? ? ? if (COMPLEX_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (from))))
> ? ? ? ? ? ?{
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ?gcc_assert (bitpos == 0);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ?result = store_expr (from, to_rtx, false, nontemporal);
>
>