This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Add ifunc attribute
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 6:07 PM, H.J. Lu<email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Richard
> Guenther<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> I started to write my own version of the documentation, but I realized
>>> that I don't even understand this. ?Which function is called by the
>>> dynamic linker, "f" or "f_ifunc"? ?Why is the attribute ignored if
>>> "f_ifunc" is not defined; shouldn't it be an error? ?I guess that means
>>> that "f_ifunc" is called by the dynamic linker; in that case, what
>>> happens if "func" is defined?
>> Yeah. ?I would have proposed that
>> void *foo (void) __attribute__((__ifunc__))
>> ?return zero;
>> would simply generate foo with indirect function type.
>> This of course causes a problem if you have a declaration for
>> the real foo available - but then you should better not have that,
>> as the compiler will then derive wrong properties for the real foo
>> from the ifunc wrapper body.
> Glibc has ifunc testcases with a declaration of foo in the same file.
> This proposal won't work with them.
They would just need to be fixed then.