This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Add ifunc attribute
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Richard
>> I started to write my own version of the documentation, but I realized
>> that I don't even understand this. ?Which function is called by the
>> dynamic linker, "f" or "f_ifunc"? ?Why is the attribute ignored if
>> "f_ifunc" is not defined; shouldn't it be an error? ?I guess that means
>> that "f_ifunc" is called by the dynamic linker; in that case, what
>> happens if "func" is defined?
> Yeah. ?I would have proposed that
> void *foo (void) __attribute__((__ifunc__))
> ?return zero;
> would simply generate foo with indirect function type.
> This of course causes a problem if you have a declaration for
> the real foo available - but then you should better not have that,
> as the compiler will then derive wrong properties for the real foo
> from the ifunc wrapper body.
Glibc has ifunc testcases with a declaration of foo in the same file.
This proposal won't work with them.