This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, doc] missing option in list
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica dot bec dot de>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:23:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc] missing option in list
- References: <20090612083021.GD3710@gmx.de>
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:30:21AM CEST:
> Joerg notified me of this doc glitch. I think it is obvious,
> but I'll wait a few hours before applying it in case anybody
> wants to comment.
Pushed this to trunk, also fixing the index entry of the following
entry.
2009-06-13 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
* doc/invoke.texi: Add missing option -Wp,OPTION in list,
fix index entry for -Xpreprocessor.
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (Revision 148450)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -7992,6 +7992,7 @@
compilation.
@table @gcctabopt
+@item -Wp,@var{option}
@opindex Wp
You can use @option{-Wp,@var{option}} to bypass the compiler driver
and pass @var{option} directly through to the preprocessor. If
@@ -8004,7 +8005,7 @@
options instead.
@item -Xpreprocessor @var{option}
-@opindex preprocessor
+@opindex Xpreprocessor
Pass @var{option} as an option to the preprocessor. You can use this to
supply system-specific preprocessor options which GCC does not know how to
recognize.