This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add ifunc attribute


"H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> writes:

> +@item ifunc ("@var{function}")
> +@cindex @code{ifunc} attribute
> +The @code{ifunc} attribute only applies to global function definition,
> +which causes the definition to be emitted as an indirec function.  For
> +instance,
> +
> +@smallexample
> +void* f_ifunc () __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f")));
> +@end smallexample
> +
> +defines @samp{f_ifunc} to be an indirect function for @samp{f}. This
> +attribute is ignored if @samp{f_ifunc} is undefined in the same
> +translation unit.
> +
> +See @code{STT_GNU_IFUNC} specified in @file{ifunc.txt} at
> +@uref{http://groups.google.com/group/generic-abi/files}.
> +
> +Not all target machines support this attribute.

This documentation needs to be much better.  I think most people reading
this would not understand the feature.  I would suggest something more
along these lines, but I would like to hear what other people think.

I started to write my own version of the documentation, but I realized
that I don't even understand this.  Which function is called by the
dynamic linker, "f" or "f_ifunc"?  Why is the attribute ignored if
"f_ifunc" is not defined; shouldn't it be an error?  I guess that means
that "f_ifunc" is called by the dynamic linker; in that case, what
happens if "func" is defined?

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]