This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libffi merge
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Haley<email@example.com> wrote:
>> Andreas Tobler wrote:
>>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Index: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c
>>> Do we really want that? As I remember we wanted to test against the
>>> built libraries from gcc. Also, we have multilib configs in gcc which
>>> will no longer be tested with the above, or not correctly.
>> Okay, so we will need to diverge the testsuite between libffi and gcc. That's
>> perfectly okay, as long as we clearly mark the section **** DO NOT MERGE ***
>> Or something...
> Wouldn't it be ideal for the libffi in the gcc tree to be identical to
> upstream, so that this mess doesn't occur again?
Of course it would, but the configury is not different just for the sake
of it, it's because the requirements are different. I don't want there
to be any differences at all, but we have to do what is possible.