This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: VTA merge - introduction
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:19:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: VTA merge - introduction
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20090605171346.GA80621@adacore.com>
I think that everyone wants more complete and more accurate debugging
information from GCC -- at -O0 and with optimization enabled. The
question is whether VTA is the right solution -- right design and
right implementation. The debuglocus project also is trying to
address this problem, I believe.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Arnaud Charlet<email@example.com> wrote:
>> I would appreciate if VTA were not merged until the community has
>> reached a consensus that it actually wants this feature.
> FWIW, I find this feature very desirable/important, the situation with
> debugging at anything else than -O0 has gotten worse and worse in
> the past years, and VTA seems definitely to go in the right direction.