This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATH][Ada] Fix multilib handling of gnat.dg when RUNTESTFLAGS is used
- From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:41:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATH][Ada] Fix multilib handling of gnat.dg when RUNTESTFLAGS is used
- References: <1236247879.11347.1296.camel@localhost> <49AFB5D6.8000607@gnu.org> <20090305114213.GA32108@ins.uni-bonn.de> <1236254225.11347.1322.camel@localhost> <20090305200502.GD14854@ins.uni-bonn.de> <1236287742.11347.1497.camel@localhost> <1237209355.8916.120.camel@localhost> <1238153427.13049.535.camel@localhost> <49CCBA86.1040808@gnu.org> <1238158517.13049.549.camel@localhost> <49CCCE9A.8080509@gnu.org> <1238867711.20989.143.camel@localhost> <1239094999.26799.5.camel@localhost> <or63fnjd8k.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
- Reply-to: laurent at guerby dot net
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 03:01 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Hi, Laurent,
>
> On Apr 7, 2009, Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net> wrote:
>
> > It's commited on trunk and 4.4, testresults from the farm
> > on x86_64 now use RUNTESTFLAGS for -m32/-m64:
>
> Erhm...
>
> This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00312.html
> caused a silent regression in gnat testing, that luckily got noisy with
> -fcompare-debug testing in the VTA branch.
This regression is known (detected by Eric Botcazou) and a potential
solution was discussed (with patches) a few weeks ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00313.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00334.html
I sent a PING for my latest patch yesterday:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01639.html
Sincerely,
Laurent