This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>, Tobias Burnus <tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:23:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()
References: <20090519223619.GA802@net-b.de> <4A1B2CAE.8000700@physik.fu-berlin.de> <4A1C5626.6030107@gmail.com> <20090526205432.GA99576@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:50:46PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
PS 1: I think one can also remove libgfortranbegin.a. This will break
linking previously compiled main programs; the solution is to re-build
them. But one can also keep libgfortranbegin, which this patch is
currently doing. What's your opinion about this?
IMHO it can be removed.
I agree with Janne.

Maybe it's possible to keep an empty stub libgfortranbegin.a that issues a warning when linked?

Cheers,
- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [Fortran,patch] PR 39178 - inline main()
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]