This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:36 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Richard Guenther > <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2009/5/16 Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com>: >>>> That is strange, it should not warn for constants. Is it really 0 or >>>> something else? >>> >>> >>> I open a bug report with a testcase: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40172 >> >> Given all this and that bootstrap is still not fixed for some targets >> I seriously >> doubt this warning is worth all this trouble. >> >> Thus, I suggest to revert the patch or make the warning not part of -Wall. >> > > How about this patch? > > -- > H.J. > --- > gcc/ > > 2009-05-18 ?Manuel López-Ibáñez ?<manu@gcc.gnu.org> Oops. Wrong ChangeLog. H.J. --- gcc/ 2009-05-18 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> PR c/40172 * toplev.c (process_options): Avoid if (!FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD && flag_stack_protect). gcc/testscase/ 2009-05-18 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> PR c/40172 * gcc.dg/pr40172.c: Add more tests. -- H.J.
Attachment:
gcc-pr40172-2.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |