This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Timothy Wall <twalljava at dev dot java dot net>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:57:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
References: <635C3243-B89E-460E-9C0F-209308D89729@dev.java.net> <b609cb3b0905171605tc6a10b7u683c43a99f97382f@mail.gmail.com> <4A109F74.6060108@gmail.com> <4DB6E56B-C18E-4021-84BD-EAE566EC0A65@dev.java.net> <4A112C2D.8060008@redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

> 
> The libffi ABI has changed?  Are you sure?

  No, I'm not clear, I'm repeating something I was told second-hand:

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-02/msg00051.html

  Maybe I just meant that the API has changed, not the ABI?

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: Timothy Wall
- Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: Timothy Wall
- Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]