This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH take 2]: Integrate GCC with the complex math library MPC (middle-end)


On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 18:47 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 May 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> >> > This patch is "take 2" of the middle-end bits for the MPC integration
> >> > originally posted and explained here:
> >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00672.html
> >> >
> >> > Tested in conjunction with the MPC configury patch, no regressions.
> >> >
> >> > Note: it's safe to install this patch separately from the other MPC bits.
> >> >
> >> > Okay for mainline?
> >>
> >> What about testcases?  (It will be of course interesting with
> >> "optional" stuff ...)
> >> Richard.
> >
> > The testcase bits were posted in March along with the original MPC set.
> > I just hadn't got around to reposting it yet.  It included code to detect
> > if MPC was available and only exercise the MPC optimizations if the
> > library was activated:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00675.html
> >
> > Since the plan is to hard-require MPC before gcc-4.5 is released, we could
> > remove the auto-detect and live with the testsuite failures for those
> > people who choose not to get MPC until it's mandatory.  Or keep the
> > auto-detect until then.  What's your preference?
> 
> The auto-detect is fine with me, but Janis has to approve it.

OK.  Sorry, I completely missed that before.

Janis


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]