This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM] hard VFP calling convention support [2/3]
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:44:31 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [ARM] hard VFP calling convention support [2/3]
- References: <1228755497.17641.20.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <1228755759.17641.27.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20090316170658.GA25942@caradoc.them.org> <49BFE301.1050307@codesourcery.com> <1237312766.17558.40.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > >> @@ -1273,6 +1287,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok {
> > >> proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok { } {
> > >> if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
> > >> return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_neon_ok object {
> > >> + #include "arm-neon.h"
> > >> int dummy;
> > >> } "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp"]
> > >> } else {
> > >
> > > It's arm_neon.h.
> >
> > The obvious patch is pre-approved.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> This is actually for a branch as the code isn't currently on trunk.
>
> Patch is pre-approved there too, but please make sure you use at least
> version 1.5 of subversion if committing to the branch as I'm using the
> new svn merge functionality to track mainline.
I have now committed this patch to the branch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com