This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] Restore removal of useless masking in store_field after expand-from-SSA
- From: Adam Nemet <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 May 2009 12:36:43 -0700
- Subject: [PATCH] Restore removal of useless masking in store_field after expand-from-SSA
This fixes the last MIPS failure (gcc.target/mips/ins-2.c) after
expand-from-SSA.
When expading a bit-field store we need to look at the defining gimple
statement for the redundant masking conversion. The reason is that LHS of the
assignment is not a gimple reg so RHS can't include a useful conversion.
Bootstrapping and regtesting on mips64octeon-linux. OK if it passes?
Adam
* expr.c (get_def_for_expr): Move it up in the file.
(store_field): When expanding a bit-field store, look at the
defining gimple stmt for the masking conversion.
--- expr.c~ 2009-05-02 17:31:40.000000000 -0700
+++ expr.c 2009-05-05 00:38:22.000000000 -0700
@@ -2249,6 +2249,26 @@ use_group_regs (rtx *call_fusage, rtx re
use_reg (call_fusage, reg);
}
}
+
+/* Return the defining gimple statement for SSA_NAME NAME if it is an
+ assigment and the code of the expresion on the RHS is CODE. Return
+ NULL otherwise. */
+
+static gimple
+get_def_for_expr (tree name, enum tree_code code)
+{
+ gimple def_stmt;
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (name) != SSA_NAME)
+ return NULL;
+
+ def_stmt = get_gimple_for_ssa_name (name);
+ if (!def_stmt
+ || gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt) != code)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return def_stmt;
+}
/* Determine whether the LEN bytes generated by CONSTFUN can be
@@ -5776,22 +5796,25 @@ store_field (rtx target, HOST_WIDE_INT b
&& compare_tree_int (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (exp)), bitsize) != 0))
{
rtx temp;
+ gimple nop_def;
/* If EXP is a NOP_EXPR of precision less than its mode, then that
implies a mask operation. If the precision is the same size as
the field we're storing into, that mask is redundant. This is
particularly common with bit field assignments generated by the
C front end. */
- if (TREE_CODE (exp) == NOP_EXPR)
+ nop_def = get_def_for_expr (exp, NOP_EXPR);
+ if (nop_def)
{
tree type = TREE_TYPE (exp);
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
&& TYPE_PRECISION (type) < GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (type))
&& bitsize == TYPE_PRECISION (type))
{
- type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0));
+ tree op = gimple_assign_rhs1 (nop_def);
+ type = TREE_TYPE (op);
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_PRECISION (type) >= bitsize)
- exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
+ exp = op;
}
}
@@ -6992,26 +7015,6 @@ expand_constructor (tree exp, rtx target
return target;
}
-/* Return the defining gimple statement for SSA_NAME NAME if it is an
- assigment and the code of the expresion on the RHS is CODE. Return
- NULL otherwise. */
-
-static gimple
-get_def_for_expr (tree name, enum tree_code code)
-{
- gimple def_stmt;
-
- if (TREE_CODE (name) != SSA_NAME)
- return NULL;
-
- def_stmt = get_gimple_for_ssa_name (name);
- if (!def_stmt
- || gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt) != code)
- return NULL;
-
- return def_stmt;
-}
-
/* expand_expr: generate code for computing expression EXP.
An rtx for the computed value is returned. The value is never null.