This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch,doc] Clarify role of -fdollar-ok vs. IMPLICIT statements


But does so by removing the clarification attempt that I put in for PR39670
less than a month ago :)

Oops, sorry. I saw the justification and thought it was a bit overkill for a manual. Now I guess it was proved to be really needed :)


What about the following?

Index: invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- invoke.texi (revision 147057)
+++ invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -256,9 +256,10 @@
@cindex $
@cindex symbol names
@cindex character set
-Allow @samp{$} as a valid non-first character in a symbol name. Symbols
+Allow @samp{$} as a valid non-first character in a symbol name. Symbols
that start with @samp{$} are rejected since it is unclear which rules to
apply to implicit typing as different vendors implement different rules.
+Using @samp{$} in @code{IMPLICIT} statements is also rejected.


 @item -fbackslash
 @opindex @code{backslash}


Please commit if OK.


Thanks,
FX


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]