This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Trivial grammar fixes in the documentation.
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: Trivial grammar fixes in the documentation.
- References: <20090425125604.GB25226@gmx.de>
One change to one of your fixes and some other issues noticed in the same
paragraphs:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> @@ -2113,7 +2113,7 @@ comparisons, and so forth.
>
> These nodes represent fixed-point constants. The type of these constants
> is obtained with @code{TREE_TYPE}. @code{TREE_FIXED_CST_PTR} points to
> -to struct fixed_value; @code{TREE_FIXED_CST} returns the structure itself.
> +a struct fixed_value; @code{TREE_FIXED_CST} returns the structure itself.
> Struct fixed_value contains @code{data} with the size of two
> HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT and @code{mode} as the associated fixed-point
There are other problems there: @code{struct fixed_value} (twice),
@code{HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT}.
> @@ -3389,7 +3389,7 @@ The native AIX tools do interoperate with GCC@.
> Building @file{libstdc++.a} requires a fix for an AIX Assembler bug
> APAR IY26685 (AIX 4.3) or APAR IY25528 (AIX 5.1). It also requires a
> fix for another AIX Assembler bug and a co-dependent AIX Archiver fix
> -referenced as APAR IY53606 (AIX 5.2) or a APAR IY54774 (AIX 5.1)
> +referenced as APAR IY53606 (AIX 5.2) or an APAR IY54774 (AIX 5.1)
I think this should be "as" not "an".
> @@ -6211,7 +6211,7 @@ This flag is enabled by default at @option{-O3}.
> @item -fipa-matrix-reorg
> @opindex fipa-matrix-reorg
> Perform matrix flattening and transposing.
> -Matrix flattening tries to replace a m-dimensional matrix
> +Matrix flattening tries to replace an m-dimensional matrix
> with its equivalent n-dimensional matrix, where n < m.
> This reduces the level of indirection needed for accessing the elements
> of the matrix. The second optimization is matrix transposing that
These would probably better use @math{m}, @math{n}, @math{n < m}.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com