This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Update TREE_USED bit on blocks


Hi,

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:

> > in the patch at 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg01025.html, Jan 
> > surreptitiously removed a test on TREE_USED from dbxout.c without 
> > realizing that the idiom is present in other debug back-ends as well. 
> > ÂI think that a better approach is to update TREE_USED instead.
> >
> > Tested (GCC, GDB) on i586-suse-linux, OK for mainline?
> 
> Ok.  Micha - this likely makes it possible to use remove-unused-locals 
> in place of the blocks pass as discussed.

Yeah, I have that in my local tree already.


Ciao,
Michael.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]