This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH RFA: Support Plan 9 extensions in gcc
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> writes:
> I think that this case:
> struct s1 { int i; };
> struct s2 { struct s1; };
> struct s3 { struct s2; struct s2; };
^^
Did you mean s1 here?
> is intended to be accepted, but writing
> int f (struct s1 *p) { return p.i; }
^^
ITYM struct s3?
> is intended to be an error because there are two different fields named
> 'i' at the same depth.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."