This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 0/3] cond-optab merge
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:22:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cond-optab merge
- References: <20090415062420.GB20649@fencepost.gnu.org>
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> * cris: better delay slots usage (counted over 900 more delay slots
> filled across a testsuite run)
I'd guess due to reorg.c missing some tstM-specific matching
...which we will never have to care about now!
> If there is any additional testing I can do, please tell. :-)
I think you deserve an applause for persevering and IMNSHO for
fully adequate testing!
If you happened to have written any scripts that could ease
future similar testing (building/comparing assembly output for a
regtest across the line), I suggest just sending them here.
Don't bother cleaning them up, except perhaps for excessive
cursing - gcc is family-friendly programming. ;)
ObBikeshed: The ChangeLog indentation looked weird when
quoted, I suggest tabifying.
brgds, H-P