This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:09:56 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend
References: <m3k55o8fiv.fsf@google.com> <466e68ee0904131339l66ecac38n98e1347539b0a2af@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360904131343k56bb4e04kbff36748efc94257@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> And now with the patch.
> 
> How about adding a warning for this case with -Wc++-compat?
> It seems better to add a warning while also committing this patch.

  OR'ing enums seems even wronger to me than adding arbitrary ints to them.

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Avoid enum bitfield in C++ frontend
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]