This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Build libgcj, libgcj-tools, and libffi as shared libraries on Windows
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:09:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build libgcj, libgcj-tools, and libffi as shared libraries on Windows
- References: <48B0BD19.email@example.com> <49E0D010.firstname.lastname@example.org> <49E0DFE1.email@example.com>
On Saturday 11 April 2009 19:22:25, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> Index: gcc/config/i386/t-cygming
> >> +jc1$(exeext): LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-stack,0x8000000
> > I think it would be better to figure out why the top-level LDFLAGS does
> > not get propagated properly into java as it does for every other
> > language, rather than sticking in this hack.
> ? Two questions:
> - ?Why "hack"? ?It's a robust mechanism specified in the GNU Make manual as
> far as I know.
Isn't this a *host* issue rather than a *target* problem? If so, it would
seem to me that a t-* file would be the wrong place for this. E.g., would a
linux x cygwin gcj need this? What about a cygwin x linux gcj ?