This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Build libgcj, libgcj-tools, and libffi as shared libraries on Windows

Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:

>> -  What does this have to do with the top-level LDFLAGS?  I didn't
>> change them
>> because I don't want cc1 and cc1plus to also have 128meg of stack, do I?
> Look at config/mh-mingw, where this is set in LDFLAGS for the entire
> build.  A while back, someone or other decided that this was the right
> thing to do.  This value should be propagated into gcc/java, the same
> way that it is for everything else, but for some weird reason, it
> doesn't propagate through the build machinery.  The value that is there
> is large enough for jc1.exe to compile libjava.
> I think the right thing to do is fix that bug, rather than just hacking
> it to use the flag that it should already be using, if you see what I mean.

  I notice that those flags get applied to everything in stage1 (xgcc, cc1,
gen* et al) and not to stages 2 or 3.  Are you sure that isn't intendtional?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]