This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR38152: procedure pointers as module variables

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:29:18 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR38152: procedure pointers as module variables
References: <854832d40904070804t2164762fy9b9578d3d2de0797@mail.gmail.com> <339c37f20904070845r35bfc1bdp9b6b374a80f9f795@mail.gmail.com>

2009/4/7 Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>:
> Janus,
>
>> Regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
> OK for trunk.

Committed as r145692. Thanks for the quick response!

Cheers,
Janus



> However....
>>
>> Should I also backport this to 4.4? If yes, would this be possible
>> before the release, or should I wait? It definitely is a regression
>> (in the way that 4.3 gave a "not implemented" message, while 4.4 gives
>> an ICE).
>
> ...in my mind at least this is not really a regression, although it is
> clearly desirable to get rid of the ICE and it is manifestly harmless.
> ?Ask the release manager(s). ?If Mark or Jakub are happy, then go for
> it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR38152: procedure pointers as module variables
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR38152: procedure pointers as module variables
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]