This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATH][Ada] Fix multilib handling of gnat.dg when RUNTESTFLAGS is used
- From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:03:19 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATH][Ada] Fix multilib handling of gnat.dg when RUNTESTFLAGS is used
- References: <1236247879.11347.1296.camel@localhost> <49AFB5D6.8000607@gnu.org> <20090305114213.GA32108@ins.uni-bonn.de> <1236254225.11347.1322.camel@localhost> <20090305200502.GD14854@ins.uni-bonn.de> <1236287742.11347.1497.camel@localhost> <1237209355.8916.120.camel@localhost> <1238153427.13049.535.camel@localhost> <49CCBA86.1040808@gnu.org> <1238158517.13049.549.camel@localhost> <49CCCE9A.8080509@gnu.org> <1238867711.20989.143.camel@localhost>
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 19:55 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 14:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > If I'm not mistaken this patch still needs mingw32 maintainer ok since
> > > there was an objection by Ralf on the behaviour of LN_S - but the two
> > > mingw32 testers I could find reported success with LN_S so far - and
> > > Arnaud ok.
> >
> > Yeah, and I actually agreed with Ralf. But given the testing results I
> > think I will overrule the Windows port maintainers. :-)
>
> I will commit the following next monday on trunk and 4.4 branch,
> the patch should includes all changes suggested by Paolo.
>
> On x86_64-linux trunk c,ada:
>
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
It's commited on trunk and 4.4, testresults from the farm
on x86_64 now use RUNTESTFLAGS for -m32/-m64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg00689.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg00696.html
Laurent