This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix for PR/39548

From: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:38:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Fix for PR/39548
References: <522e93240903241102rd2c0a1cn4bab064e3a26bb3@mail.gmail.com> <522e93240903251538p424d11f4n22d9bf3d792cf92c@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000903251554qce42417nc7dd19365ceb8a76@mail.gmail.com> <522e93240903251743mf526e4nc12e1726055c03b9@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50903260543o3aa41dcdqd2ca5c55e2d996df@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 20:43, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>> around 54k bytes. Ok this time?
>
> I'm confused.  Didn't you say that you had reduced the test case to
> ~8k upthread?

~80k before -- my eyes were tired.

David

>
>
> Diego.
>

References:
- Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]