This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR target/39472: Add -mabi=[ms|sysv]


On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/17 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hallo H.J,
>>>>
>>>> this patch looks fine to me, beside these three junks
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -2740,7 +2757,7 @@ override_options (bool main_args_p)
>>>>> ? ? ? ? use of rip-relative addressing. ?This eliminates fixups that
>>>>> ? ? ? ? would otherwise be needed if this object is to be placed in a
>>>>> ? ? ? ? DLL, and is essentially just as efficient as direct addressing. ?*/
>>>>> - ? ? ?if (TARGET_64BIT && DEFAULT_ABI == MS_ABI)
>>>>> + ? ? ?if (TARGET_64BIT && ix86_abi == MS_ABI)
>>>>> ? ? ? ?ix86_cmodel = CM_SMALL_PIC, flag_pic = 1;
>>>>> ? ? ? else if (TARGET_64BIT)
>>>>> ? ? ? ?ix86_cmodel = flag_pic ? CM_SMALL_PIC : CM_SMALL;
>>>>
>>>> Do you want really to modify by this switch to pic mode and small
>>>> model for linux64?
>>>
>>> OK, I will remove it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -10096,7 +10115,7 @@ output_pic_addr_const (FILE *file, rtx x
>>>>> ?#endif
>>>>> ? ? ? ? ?assemble_name (file, name);
>>>>> ? ? ? ?}
>>>>> - ? ? ?if (!TARGET_MACHO && !(TARGET_64BIT && DEFAULT_ABI == MS_ABI)
>>>>> + ? ? ?if (!TARGET_MACHO && !(TARGET_64BIT && ix86_abi == MS_ABI)
>>>>> ? ? ? ? ?&& code == 'P' && ! SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x))
>>>>> ? ? ? ?fputs ("@PLT", file);
>>>>> ? ? ? break;
>>>>
>>>> This looks wrong to me, because for coff targets you never can emit @PLT.
>>>
>>> I will remove it.
>>>
>>>>> @@ -26683,7 +26702,7 @@ x86_function_profiler (FILE *file, int l
>>>>> ? ? ? fprintf (file, "\tleaq\t%sP%d@(%%rip),%%r11\n", LPREFIX, labelno);
>>>>> ?#endif
>>>>>
>>>>> - ? ? ?if (DEFAULT_ABI == SYSV_ABI && flag_pic)
>>>>> + ? ? ?if (ix86_abi == SYSV_ABI && flag_pic)
>>>>> ? ? ? ?fprintf (file, "\tcall\t*%s@GOTPCREL(%%rip)\n", MCOUNT_NAME);
>>>>> ? ? ? else
>>>>> ? ? ? ?fprintf (file, "\tcall\t%s\n", MCOUNT_NAME);
>>>>
>>>> the same here, pep-coff do not have really a GOTPCREL.
>>>> By this I would check here DEFAULT_ABI, because it is the targets
>>>> default and can be used to decide if @PLT and @GOTPCREL are present.
>>>
>>> I will remove it.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Here is the updated patch. I also changed
>> gcc.target/x86_64/abi/callabi/vaarg-5b.c
>> to test cross ABI vararg. OK for 4.5 and 4.4 after it is reopened?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>>
>
> Yes, ok.

Not for 4.4, as this is a new feature.  Also I don't think you can approve
i386 backend changes.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Kai
>
>
> --
> | ?(\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
> | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
> | (")_(") him gain world domination
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]