This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fix ICE in predictive commoning
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:44:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Fix ICE in predictive commoning
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902141240590.20099@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <84fc9c000902140503u32f89df0gf02d2d4388850b4c@mail.gmail.com> <20090216161500.GA18342@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20090223182742.GA6138@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903030213480.24836@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
>> > I think the right solution would be to modify simple_iv to take a basic
>> > block (or loop), not a statement, as an argument (currently, we use
>> > only bb_for_stmt (stmt)->loop_father there, anyway). ?I will prepare
>> > a patch,
>>
>> here it is, bootstrapped & regtested on i686. ?I am not sure whether the patch is
>> appropriate for the current stage, I will defer the decision to you,
>
> It looks like this
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg01077.html> is still pending
> review.
The patch is ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> (If it goes in I'll commit the testcase I posted with my original patch
> proposal.)
>
> --
> - Show quoted text -
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com
>