This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, 4.3] Fix PR middle-end/38616
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> H.J. Lu writes:
>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>> > The backport was suggested in the bug report; checked on
>>> > i486-linux-gnu with a biarch compiler without regressions.
>>> >
>>> > Ok for the branch (and the testcase for the trunk)?
>>> >
>>> > Matthias
>>> >
>>> > gcc/
>>> >
>>> > 2009-01-11 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
>>> >
>>> > PR middle-end/38616, backport from mainline:
>>> > 2008-05-04 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>> > * config/i386/i386.md (*strmovsi_1): Simplify asm alternatives.
>>> > (*strmovsi_rex_1): Ditto.
>>> > (*strsetsi_1): Ditto.
>>> > (*strsetsi_rex_1): Ditto.
>>> >
>>> > (add<mode>cc): Macroize expander from addqicc, addhicc, addsicc and
>>> > adddicc expanders using SWI mode iterator.
>>> >
>>> > gcc/testsuite/
>>> >
>>> > 2009-01-11 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
>>> >
>>> > PR middle-end/38616
>>> > * gcc.dg/pr38616.c: New test.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I don't think this back port is sufficient to fix this. On
>>> Fedora 10/x86, I saw
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38902
>>
>> confirmed. I rechecked, and I have to say that the patch doesn't fix
>> the problem. I cannot reproduce what I made wrong with testing the
>> patch. Sorry about that.
>
> Can you revert the testcase (just the testcase) on the branch for now?
>
A patch is available at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00948.html
--
H.J.