This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] movmem/setmem alignment code
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: "Raksit Ashok" <raksit at google dot com>
- Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, jh at suse dot cz
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:01:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] movmem/setmem alignment code
- References: <9718380a0807062335y20c7d182o2483bc774527e95d@mail.gmail.com> <m3d4low7fr.fsf@google.com> <9718380a0807081521h27de6250re26dedfcebedf1d5@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Raksit Ashok <raksit@google.com> wrote:
> This was committed as revision 137646.
>
> thanks,
> raksit
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> "Raksit Ashok" <raksit@google.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2008-07-07 Raksit Ashok <raksit@google.com>
>>>
>>> * expr.c (emit_block_move_via_movmem): Fix expected_align parameter.
>>> (set_storage_via_setmem): Fix expected_align parameter.
>>> * doc/invoke.texi (i386 and x86-64 Options): Add a couple of options
>>> missing from the list.
>>> * doc/md.texi (movmem): Explicitly state that expected alignment is
>>> to be expressed in bytes.
>>> (setmem): Explicitly state that expected alignment is to be expressed
>>> in bytes.
>>
>> This is OK.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
It caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
--
H.J.