This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
>> Hum, the idea is fine; I'm unfamiliar with the construct. I've seen it
>> spelled this way:
>>
>> target { ! { powerpc*-*-darwin* hppa*-*-hpux* ia64-*-hpux* } }
>>
>> not not sure about that spelling. Ok if you're sure or find someone to
>> confirm it.
>
> Mike,
> The testsuite/22_locale/ctype/is/char/2.cc testcase uses this form
> of a negative match...
>
> // { dg-do run { xfail *-*-![linux]* } }
>
>
> ...so unless that testcase is broken, the use of 'xfail *-*-![darwin]*'
> should be equally valid.
I agree that the syntax seemed weird and I had never seen it, and that
I'd rather find the spelling similar to Mike's proposed one in other
testcases, and use it. Maybe fixing the other example you found, too. :-)
Paolo