This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c on SPARC

From: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:27:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c on SPARC
References: <200811232201.06847.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <38a0d8450811240331u1906b06duf55cd34925fe1228@mail.gmail.com> <200811241258.50422.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

> Any particular reason why you chose to mark symbols in output_operand and not
> in output_addr_const, where this seems to belong?

Not that I can remember. I had to move it out of the FE and not being
very familiar with the code, output_operand looked like a good spot.

> --
> Eric Botcazou
>


Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Avila de Espindola

Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland | Registration Number: 368047

References:
- [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c on SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c on SPARC
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c on SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]