This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] A new meta intrinsic header file for current and future x86 instrinsics.


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:55 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> We can have <x86intrin.h> which has
>
> #include <immtrin.h>  // ISA extensions from Intel
> #include <myISAintrin.h>  // ISA extensions from AMD
> #include <yourISAintrin.h>  // ISA extensions from XYZ
>
> Intel, AMD and XYZ can add new ISA extensions to
> their header files. It doesn't stop FOOBAR from
> creating a processor which implements ISAs
> from <immtrin.h>, <myISAintrin.h> and <yourISAintrin.h>.

But WHY???? Just have x86_intrinsics.h (spelled out too).

x86 architecture has become a mess because there is no standardization
between the companies.  Even the Power ISA is now mostly controlled by
Power.org with standardization of the ISA happening there instead of
by IBM/Freescale.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]