This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:00:29 -0500
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
References: <20081104212921.GG1057@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4911C0FB.6080009@codesourcery.com> <20081106091416.GC3572@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <49172122.4070808@codesourcery.com> <4918B577.2040603@redhat.com> <4918B965.9030002@codesourcery.com>

I note that the code in gimplify_call_expr is the only place in the compiler that checks the DECL_ARG_TYPE of a called function; everywhere else only uses it for the parameters of the function currently being compiled. This is why this mismatch has not been a problem in the past. Perhaps gimplify_call_expr shouldn't be relying on it?

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up DECL_ARG_TYPE (PR c++/36631)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]