This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix mcf.c reliance on a GCC extension (PR bootstrap/38088)

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:23:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mcf.c reliance on a GCC extension (PR bootstrap/38088)
References: <20081112210323.GV3572@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <491B4950.7090706@redhat.com> <20081112212543.GW3572@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:23:28PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Attached are 2 alternative patches to fix this.  According to
>>> hwint.h HOST_WIDEST_INT can be long, long long or __int64 and
>>> __LONG_LONG_MAX__ is a GCC built-in macro that most other compilers
>>> don't have.  Both have been (separately) bootstrapped/regtested
>>> on x86_64-linux.
>>>
>>> Ok for trunk?
>> For which one do you seek approval?  :-)
> 
> Doesn't matter. ;)

Well, I prefer mine 'cos it's a lot easier to read.

Either way this is obvious/trivial and doesn't require approval.

Andrew.

References:
- [PATCH] Fix mcf.c reliance on a GCC extension (PR bootstrap/38088)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix mcf.c reliance on a GCC extension (PR bootstrap/38088)
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH] Fix mcf.c reliance on a GCC extension (PR bootstrap/38088)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]