This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)

From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: jh at suse dot cz, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:46:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
References: <48C056E3.1020305@redhat.com> <48DD597D.6090705@redhat.com> <20080926215724.GB746@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <48E24B64.3060608@redhat.com> <48EA68F0.60905@redhat.com> <48EA92AA.6080105@redhat.com> <48EDAD24.2020004@redhat.com> <490EDFBF.1000206@redhat.com> <84fc9c000811030436v17525197xbf01dbb69c356ca9@mail.gmail.com> <490F024A.40101@redhat.com> <84fc9c000811030642o7f36efc8l851edabf31c98c5d@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther a écrit :

So the only problem is the following line

DECL_INITIAL (node->decl) = error_mark_node;
in cgraph_release_function_body?  Does it fix the PR
if you make that conditional on DECL_ABSTRACT?

Yes, it fixes the problem. And in a much more compact way than what I was trying to do. Thanks.

I am still running regtests (for C and C++). I will post a new patch when that's done.

Thanks,

Dodji.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]