This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
2008/10/26 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>: > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > >> 2008-10-23 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR c++/36254 >> * gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Propagate the no_warning flag. >> * gimple-low.c (lower_function_body): Propagate the no_warning >> flag. > > What does the comipler-generated code for this testcase look like, and > why is it confusing the warning machinery? See the gimple dump attached. Basically, we surround the whole function in try/finally. Then, because flow falls to the end of the function, we add a return. I can attach other dumps if you want, but I think the problem is already here. Cheers, Manuel.
Attachment:
pr36254.C.004t.gimple
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |