This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.


2008/10/22 Chris Lattner <clattner@apple.com>:

> Do you have a plan for how to implement this?  I'm curious whether GCC's LTO
> still aims to be a transparent drop in, even supporting harder cases like
> this.  Is multi-language support (e.g. mixing C++ and C or Fortran or Ada
> code) also still planned?

I don't have one right now but at the minimum, we should save the
command line options used in object files and check for command line
option compatibility when we read in objects.  In theory, LTO should
support mixing languages as it operates IR in the middle-end but I
have to look at the design doc for sure.

-Doug


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]