This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.

From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple dot com>
To: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?= <dougkwan at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:36:43 -0700
Subject: Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
References: <498552560810212353k75bbfc1au80b8f15fe10dfa98@mail.gmail.com> <DEEBE879-8365-496D-8D83-F7077F50F645@apple.com> <498552560810221032j7c3ac585t16a03c89b0b066c1@mail.gmail.com>

On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:

No this does not.  In general, it is a problem if we mix and match
objects compiled with different flags like FP math trapping.  We need
to address this problem in the future.

Do you have a plan for how to implement this? I'm curious whether GCC's LTO still aims to be a transparent drop in, even supporting harder cases like this. Is multi-language support (e.g. mixing C++ and C or Fortran or Ada code) also still planned?

-Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Handle -fexceptions properly.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]