This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Check for availability of backtrace() for boehm-gc on uClibc
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:38:24 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for availability of backtrace() for boehm-gc on uClibc
- References: <20081007181917.GC5178@mx.loc>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
Bernhard> uClibc does not currently have support for backtrace(). Iff
Bernhard> support would be added, then we would hint that via
Bernhard> __UCLIBC_HAS_BACKTRACE__.
Bernhard> We are carrying this snippet since about 4.0.0 now. I fear
Bernhard> that boem-gc upstream != gcc, though?
Yeah -- we accept GC changes, but we prefer them to go upstream first.
What platform is this for? I ask because the GC should only be built
if Java is enabled, and if Java is enabled this is probably the least
of your porting worries.
Tom