This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:43:16 -0600
Subject: Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
References: <48D05B5E.40802@redhat.com> <8763ortc0u.fsf@firetop.home> <48D7C900.9080108@redhat.com> <87wsh458e7.fsf@firetop.home> <48D7F001.2070009@redhat.com> <6dc9ffc80809221227j38c41c55p1db2b42ce39a7281@mail.gmail.com>

H.J. Lu wrote:

Hi Vladimir,

Your patch:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01176.html

caused this regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37598

I don't think it can be applied ASIS. But Richard's patch fixes PR 37535 and doesn't have any regressions on Linux/ia32, Linux/ia64 and Linux/Intel64.

I've been able to reproduce the comparison failure.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

References:
- RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: RFA: patch to solve PR37535
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]