This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Daniel Kraft wrote:This is fixed with the new patch and your test compiles fine, too, and outputs the expected values.
The new patch is just regression testing. What do you think about this one? Or do you think the way this patch works is completely wrong and I should try to find another solution? I just thought it would be the best idea to reuse the existing logic in gfc_conv_string_length for gfc_conv_expr_descriptor/gfc_conv_string_length.I think this solution is ok. Thus: OK for the trunk. Especially as this is only an ICE and not a wrong-code bug, I think backporting is not needed.
Yours, Daniel
-- Done: Arc-Bar-Cav-Sam-Val-Wiz, Dwa-Elf-Gno-Hum-Orc, Law-Neu-Cha, Fem-Mal To go: Hea-Kni-Mon-Pri-Ran-Rog-Tou
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |