This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows

From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
To: Danny Smith <dansmister at gmail dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:23:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
References: <48A9C461.9010901@aaronwl.com> <9c03c2dd0808182010o25aae49x721aeb9de20f312e@mail.gmail.com> <48AC22F3.30103@aaronwl.com> <9c03c2dd0808202044i50d8e8dai5927298ad2b105ac@mail.gmail.com> <07fd01c907d3$b6adb0e0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <9c03c2dd0808270040v30fa77bauffe3612b786727df@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>

Danny Smith wrote:

> The "downside" of this is that  we  force user to always add
> "-shared-libgcc" to gcc command line rather than allow the clever user
> to rely on a libgcc.dll.a vs libgcc.a  link order diff.

I'm not sure that will work in the case of Cygwin then, since the plan
as I understand it is to behave like Linux: shared libgcc is the default
if not specified, and must be overridden with -static-libgcc.

Brian

References:
- [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Danny Smith
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Danny Smith
- RE: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Danny Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]