This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]

From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebastian dot pop at amd dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Jan Sjodin" <jan dot sjodin at amd dot com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:32:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
References: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808071437550.3427@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <cb9d34b20808181236n32c333a8r884cd18b04fdaa7a@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808182315370.3427@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> So can we expect this to happen in a reasonable timeframe?  Like
> for example at least with priority over more fancy optimizations?

Yes, this is high priority for us for the next release of CLooG.

> I am ok with not doing this before the merge, but this doesn't look
> like something we should still have when Graphite goes into "production
> state" (GCC 4.5).
>

Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
  - From: Albert Cohen
- Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
  - From: Sebastian Pop

References:
- Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: Graphite review, graphite parts [1/n]
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]